APAN Community
APAN Community
  • Site
  • User
  • Community  Chat Connect  Maps Translate  Support
  • Site
  • Search
  • User

Foreign Military Studies Office
  • Working Groups
  • TRADOC G-2 Operational Environment
  • Foreign Military Studies Office
  • Cancel
Foreign Military Studies Office
O E Watch Mobile Edition A Russian Approach to Interagency Cooperation
  • Files
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
  • +OE Watch Mobile Edition
  • OE Watch, Vol 08, Issue 06, Jun 2018 (Mobile Edition)
  • +OE Watch, Vol 08, Issue 05, May 2018 (Mobile Edition)
  • -OE Watch, Vol 08, Issue 04, Apr 2018 (Mobile Edition)
    • 13 Million Users of Domestic Messaging Apps in Iran
    • A Chinese Perspective on Pakistan-Russian Cooperation in Afghanistan
    • A Militarized Silicon Valley in Russia?
    • A Russian Approach to Interagency Cooperation
    • A Turkish View of the Wagner Group in Syria
    • Arresting Iranian Cyber Criminals
    • Azerbaijan and Georgia Increase Bilateral Security Cooperation
    • Beyond Bitcoin: Could China Embrace Blockchain for Defense and Security Applications?
    • Boko Haram Repeats Chibok Kidnapping, Now in Dapchi
    • Bombs Detonated on Ferry and Tourist Vessel in Mexico
    • Brazil Has a Border Problem
    • China Commits to Building Global Satellite Communication Network by 2023
    • China Seeks Extradition of Detained Uyghurs in Malaysia
    • China’s Focus on the Development of “High-Quality Weapons and Equipment” for the Navy
    • Colombian Forces Fight the ELN
    • Concern in Kazakhstan over Returning Foreign Fighters from Syria
    • Continuing Violence in Mexico Fuels Armored Car Business
    • Covert Supply Lines
    • Cracks in Bolivarian Military Morale
    • Cristina Fernández’s Legal Jeopardy
    • Elections in Colombia
    • Elections in Cuba
    • Elections in El Salvador
    • Escalation in Syria?
    • Fact or Psychological Warfare? China’s Development of the World’s Strongest Individual Firepower System
    • Impact of Odebrecht Scandal on Peruvian Economy
    • Interview with Russian Navy Commander Admiral Korolev
    • Iran Unveils New Anti-Armor Missile
    • Iran: Israel’s Missile Defense Can Be Overwhelmed
    • Iran: Muslims Supported by US, UK are Illegitimate
    • Iran: Supreme Leader Advisor Lauds Russian Strategic Ties
    • Iranian Environmentalists Arrested as Spies
    • Is China Practicing “Debt-Trap Diplomacy” in Africa?
    • Local Debate on AMISOM: Should It Stay or Should It Go?
    • New Russian Officer Code of Conduct
    • Nigeria’s Environmental Devastation Drives Conflict
    • “Holy Defense:” Hezbollah’s New First-Person Shooter Video Game
  • +OE Watch, Vol 08, Issue 03, Mar 2018 (Mobile Edition)
  • +Monographs, Papers and Special Essays (PDF To Text Conversion)

You are currently reviewing an older revision of this page.

  • History View current version

A Russian Approach to Interagency Cooperation

OE Watch Commentary: A good example of Russia’s military-scientific approach to problem solving was on display in the December 2017 edition of Russia’s military theory journal, Military Thought. On the subject of identifying key problems with collective information-sharing tasks between Russian government entities, Y.G. Anisimov, V.G. Anisimov, and E.V. Solohov lay out an extensive argument for interagency cooperation that is significantly based on mathematical modeling and quantitative analysis. For Russian professional readers, this would be an entirely normal article and an understandable approach to the argument. The fact that the authors are all general officers and two have doctoral degrees is also par for the course. The article does not highlight specific current event-based issues, rather, it is an appeal for a general acceptance of a scientific-based approach to conducting information sharing among “federal executive bodies” on security and defense issues.

The purpose of this commentary is not a review of the math involved, rather just to highlight an example this discussion framework. From a standpoint of research and development, the authors explain that developing predictive methods and making decisions based on mathematically predictive outputs would find an immediate and agree-able audience among Russian federal bodies. They also indicate that this approach would provide enhanced feasibility with a choice of
and use of multiple predictive models and the ability to coordinate decision-making from local to global levels.

The models presented in the article show “possible synergy effects of two [generic] interacting agencies” and the application of generic “capabilities and resources.” The authors’ statement, “Experience tells us that these types of interactions are not always effective,” surely evokes a knowing nod from anyone working with large bureaucracies.

With the advent of Russia’s National Defense Management Center and its emphasis on consolidation of defense and security information, new bureaucratic procedures and even a bureaucratic culture would be expected to emerge. A scientific approach, inherent in Russian military science education and practice, is a natural Russian response. Serious discussions by leading strategic researchers and policy-makers are likely to proceed from this approach. End OE Watch Commentary (Wilhelm, Vainer)

 “Effective security measures can only be applied by simultaneous, coordinated deployment of all the country’s available capabilities and resources. They synergetic effect of these deployments is synonymous with accomplishing the Russian Federation’s security and defense mission.”
 Source: Е.Г.Анисимов, В.Г. Анисимов, и И.В.Солохов, Проблемы Научно-методическово обеспечния межведомственного информацонного взаимодействия, Военная Мыцл, Но.12, Декабр 2017, стр. 45-51. (Y.G. Anisimov, V.G.Anisimov, and E.V. Solohov, “The Issue of Providing for Scientific Methodological Interagency Information Cooperation,” Military Thought, No.12, December 2017, pp.45-51.)
 …The stated interaction objective is to maximize the synergy effect by applying capabilities and resources from various agencies. Thus, the most effective form of interaction is symbiosis. If this is not to be achieved for whatever reason, then the acceptable ways of interaction maybe commensalism or neutralism…

 

Language Selector
Click to hide this icon and message
Select Your Language
  • Support
  • /
  • Hotline: Help Desk 808-472-7855
  • /
  • Privacy
  • /
  • Terms
  • Powered by All Partners Access Network